Comparato v. Schait
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court 1
848 A.2d 770 (2004)
180 N.J. 90
Richard COMPARATO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Rochelle SCHAIT (formerly known as Comparato), Defendant-Respondent.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued March 2, 2004.
Decided June 2, 2004.
Patricia M. Barbarito, Denville, argued the cause for appellant (Einhorn, Harris, Ascher, Barbarito, Frost & Ironson, attorneys; Bonnie C. Frost, of counsel and on the brief).
Neil S. Braun, Springfield, argued the cause for respondent (Gomperts & Braun, attorneys; Mr. Braun and Priscilla A.J. Miller, on the brief).
2Opinion of the Court · VernieroJustice Verniero
In this matrimonial matter, plaintiff seeks to disqualify the trial judge…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Higgins v. Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics of the Supreme CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Matter of YaccarinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- In Re Opinion No. 415, New Jersey Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional EthicsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Matter of Opinion No. 653Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.