Legal Opinion

Comparato v. Schait

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 2, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

848 A.2d 770 (2004)

180 N.J. 90

Richard COMPARATO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Rochelle SCHAIT (formerly known as Comparato), Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 2, 2004.

Decided June 2, 2004.

Patricia M. Barbarito, Denville, argued the cause for appellant (Einhorn, Harris, Ascher, Barbarito, Frost & Ironson, attorneys; Bonnie C. Frost, of counsel and on the brief).

Neil S. Braun, Springfield, argued the cause for respondent (Gomperts & Braun, attorneys; Mr. Braun and Priscilla A.J. Miller, on the brief).

2Opinion of the Court · VernieroJustice Verniero

In this matrimonial matter, plaintiff seeks to disqualify the trial judge…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Higgins v. Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics of the Supreme CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. Matter of YaccarinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. In Re Opinion No. 415, New Jersey Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional EthicsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  5. Matter of Opinion No. 653Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API