Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 17, 2009No. 205PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Read, J.
In January 2005, the New York City Police Department (NYPD) informed representatives of various police unions, including the Detectives Endowment Association (DEA), Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association (PBA), Sergeants’ Benevolent Association (SBA), and Captains Endowment Association (CEA) (collectively, the unions), that it intended to use a methodology for hair testing known as radioimmunoassay (hereafter, RIAH or hair analysis) for all drug screening of uniformed members, beginning the following summer. The unions protested that this decision was subject to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cohoes City School District v. Cohoes Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- City of Watertown v. State of New York Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of City of New York, Inc. v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
3Cited by15 opinions
- New York City Transit Authority v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Deitch v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Chiofalo v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- City of Middletown v. City of Middletown Police Benevolent Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- City of Schenectady v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.