Legal Opinion

Bleeker v. Hyde

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan

Decided October 15, 1843PublishedCited by 9 opinions

[At law. Action by Bleeker against O. M. Hyde for goods sold on faith of a letter of credit

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

The defendant gave the following letter of credit: “Messrs. Erastus Corney & Co. New York. Gentlemen, I hereby authorise Messrs. A. & D. Wallingsford to purchase goods, such as they may wish to, in my name and on my account, to the amount of twenty-five hundred dollars. (Signed,) O. M. Hyde, 20th Sept. 1841.” Under this letter Wallingsfords purchased goods of Corney & Co. to the amount of $1453, and of the plaintiff to the amount of $1046.04.

It is objected that the letter of credit did not authorize a purchase from the plaintiff, and that consequently the defendant is not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. v. HiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  2. Robbins v. BinghamNew York Supreme Court · 1809

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. National Bank v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. F. Mitchell & Bro. v. RailtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Bank of Buchanan County v. Continental Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  4. Thompson v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
  5. Johnson v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API