Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Barker v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2012No. Nos. 2010-SC-000116-DG, 2010-SC-000123-DGPublished

1ConcurrenceCunningham, J.

First of all, I concur with the majority that, in both Barker and Jones, the trial court did not have to wait upon a conviction for new charges before proceeding to a hearing and revocation of probation based upon the commission of additional offenses. I furthermore agree in the result of our decision to uphold the revocation of Barker’s probation, but I disagree with the reasoning. By implication in Barker, and by direct holding in Jones, this Court — for the first time to my knowledge — invests the courts with the prosecu-torial function of immunity for criminal defendants.

I respectfully,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Braswell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API