Barker v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceCunningham, J.
First of all, I concur with the majority that, in both Barker and Jones, the trial court did not have to wait upon a conviction for new charges before proceeding to a hearing and revocation of probation based upon the commission of additional offenses. I furthermore agree in the result of our decision to uphold the revocation of Barker’s probation, but I disagree with the reasoning. By implication in Barker, and by direct holding in Jones, this Court — for the first time to my knowledge — invests the courts with the prosecu-torial function of immunity for criminal defendants.
I respectfully,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Braswell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.