Legal Opinion · Dissent

Blake v. Mayo Nursing & Convalescing Home, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1976No. 1619Published

1DissentSpaeth, Judge

The somewhat curious title of this opinion may be explained as follows: I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the appeal should be quashed; I would consider it on the merits. So far as concerns the parties, this disagreement is of little importance, for when the appeal is considered on the merits, the conclusion is reached that the order of the lower court should be affirmed. Thus either way — the majority’s or mine — appellant loses. So far as concerns the law, however, it may perhaps contribute a little bit if I state the basis of my disagreement with the majority.

I

As the majority…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haefele v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. AB v. Continental ImportsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Liberty National Bank v. DegillioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Ifft v. HunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Blymiller v. BaccantiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API