Legal Opinion

Standard Concrete Products Inc. v. General Truck Drivers Union Local 952

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 14, 2006No. 04-56070Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Teamsters Local 952 (“Teamsters”) appeals the district court’s order denying its motion to retax costs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 and we affirm.

In 2003, a panel of this court affirmed in part and reversed in part a district court decision interpreting a collective bargaining agreement between Standard Concrete and Teamsters. See Standard Concrete Prods. Inc. v. Gen. Truck Drivers, Office, Food and Warehouse Union, Local 952, 353 F.3d 668, 673, 679 (9th Cir.2003). In a separate order, we instructed that each party should bear its own costs of suit. Nonetheless,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. James Miles v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Standard Concrete Products Inc. v. General Truck Drivers, Office, Food and Warehouse Union, Local 952, Standard Concrete Products Inc. v. General Truck Drivers, Office, Food and Warehouse Union, Local 952Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API