Legal Opinion

Mamula v. Ford Motor Company

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1971No. 371A49Published

1Opinion of the Court

275 N.E.2d 849 (1971)

Peter MAMULA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 371A49.

Appellate Court of Indiana, Division No. 1.

December 6, 1971.

Rehearing Denied December 30, 1971.

Joseph G. Ettl, Ettl & Ettl, Richard C. Kaczmarek, South Bend, for plaintiff-appellant.

James H. Pankow, South Bend, for defendant-appellee.

BUCHANAN, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS — This is an appeal of a personal injury products liability case from a directed verdict entered for the defendant-appellee, Ford Motor Company (Ford), at the close of plaintiff's evidence.

In December of 1964,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Gamble v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Nugent v. Nugent's Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  5. Whitaker, Admr. v. BorntragerIndiana Supreme Court · 1954

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API