Legal Opinion
Kulkarni v. Nyquist
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided January 5, 1977No. 76-CV-344 and 76-CV-360PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
In these actions there was submitted for decision, without oral argument, a motion in behalf of plaintiffs and cross-motion by-defendants for summary judgment. Additionally, the plaintiffs seek a determination to maintain the actions as class actions and have filed a motion for such certification under Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 23(c)(1). This motion was also submitted without oral argument along with their motion for summary judgment. The two individual actions above, involving common questions of law and fact, were consolidated pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.Pro. 42(a) by…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harris v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979
- Kulkarni v. NyquistDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1977
- Medvid by Jeziersky v. New Orleans Police Dept.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1985
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1989
- Question Submitted by: Mr. Brandon Clabes, Executive Director, Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement Commission, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2026