Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. Snow

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding.

1Per curiam

The decree below might properly be affirmed for want of compliance with rule 15 of this court upon the part of counsel for appellant. The only statement of the case is that it is an appeal from a writ of assistance. The ground of appeal is stated to be, that appellant “is now prosecuting a writ of error in this cause in general No. 902, now pending in this .court at the present term, and that the disclosures in the record in that case' show conclusively that no writ of assistance should have been granted before the final determination of that case. The briefest reference to the record in that…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. GarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Revelone, Inc. v. Arlind Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
  3. Cassidy v. Automatic Time Stamp Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API