Legal Opinion

Kane v. Cicero & Proviso Electric Ry. Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 13, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Trespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Jesse Holdom, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Windes

delivered the opinion of the court.

The first question to be considered is, as to whether the plaintiff in error, by his evidence, made a case which should have been submitted to the jury.

“Motions to exclude the evidence from the jury, and motions to instruct the jury to find for the defendant, are in the nature of demurrers to evidence, * * * in that they admit not only all that the testimony of the plaintiff proves, but also all it tends to prove.” Bartelott v. International Bank, 119 Ill. 259.

To the same effect, in substance, are the following cases: Frazer v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Offutt v. World's Columbian ExpositionIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Frazer v. HoweIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Bartelott v. International BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. North Chicago Street Railroad v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. ConlanIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rodríguez Cruz v. White Star Bus Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1939
  2. Chicago City Railway Co. v. ShreveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906
  3. Rodríguez Cruz v. White Star Bus Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API