Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1996No. 94-2894-CRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonald W. Steinmetz, J.

The issue presented in this case is whether a defendant, as part of a plea agreement with the State, can enter an Alford 1 plea to a crime which was legally impossible for the defendant to have committed. We hold that in order to accept an Alford plea, even in the context of a plea agreement, a court must find that there is strong proof of guilt as to each element of the crime to which the defendant is pleading. Since it was legally impossible in this case for the defendant to have committed the crime to which he entered an Alford plea, the trial court could not have found strong proof of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State v. BangertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. GarciaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. RockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Warren v. SchwarzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State Ex Rel. Jacobus v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. LackershireWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API