Legal Opinion

Knaub v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1979No. 3-878A193PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

A jury found Penny M. Knaub and Daniel R. Bowen guilty of visiting a common nuisance, and it found Knaub guilty of possession of marijuana. Each of the convic tions was based solely on physical evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant, the validity of which Knaub and Bowen challenged both at trial and in this appeal.

The statutory requirements for the issuance of a search warrant are set forth in IC 1971, 35-1-6-2 (Burns Code Ed., 1975):

“No warrant for search or arrest shall be issued until there is filed with the justice of the peace, judge of any city court or magistrate’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Madden v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Taggart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Holtel v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. McPherson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nash v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. BarkerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Flaherty v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Ruth v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Mickens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API