Knaub v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge.
A jury found Penny M. Knaub and Daniel R. Bowen guilty of visiting a common nuisance, and it found Knaub guilty of possession of marijuana. Each of the convic tions was based solely on physical evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant, the validity of which Knaub and Bowen challenged both at trial and in this appeal.
The statutory requirements for the issuance of a search warrant are set forth in IC 1971, 35-1-6-2 (Burns Code Ed., 1975):
“No warrant for search or arrest shall be issued until there is filed with the justice of the peace, judge of any city court or magistrate’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Madden v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
- Taggart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Holtel v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- McPherson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nash v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. BarkerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Flaherty v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Ruth v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Mickens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.