Legal Opinion

Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco v. Rains

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 20, 1985No. 85-444PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANAHY, Judge.

The question presented to us is whether a slot machine constitutes gambling paraphernalia subject to forfeiture under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, sections 932.701-932.704, Florida Statutes (1983) (the Act). We hold that it does, and reverse the order of the trial judge denying forfeiture.

The machine involved in this case is called a Video Hi-Lo Double Up Joker Poker machine. At the outset, we note that the appellees present no argument that the machine is not a slot machine as defined in section 849.16, Florida Statutes (1983). We take that to be a tacit admission…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schultz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Report 2012-07Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
  2. In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES— REPORT NO. 2013-06Supreme Court of Florida · 2014
  3. In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2018-10.Supreme Court of Florida · 2018
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1998
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API