Legal Opinion
City of Duluth v. National Indian Gaming Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 18, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2013-0246PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
Plaintiff City of Duluth (“the City” or “Plaintiff’) brings this action against Defendants the National Indian Gaming Commission and Jonodev Chaudhuri, in his official capacity as the Acting Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission 1 (collectively “Defendants”), asserting claims under the Administrative Procedure Act. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ [8] Motion to Dismiss. Upon eon- . sideration of the pleadings 2 , the relevant legal authorities, and the record as a whole, the Court DENIES Defendants’ [8]…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Duluth v. National Indian Gaming CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015