Bradford v. State Ex Rel. Esslinger
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto to test the right or title of the parties to this cause to the office of city attorney for the city of Fairfield. It is not controverted that a third party was duly and legally elected city attorney in October 1932, and that the term or fraction thereof as claimed by these respective parties relates to a period anterior to October 17, 1932. While this proceeding was instituted and tried in the circuit court before the term or fractional term involved expired, this case was not submitted to this court until November 30, 1932, and after the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State ex rel. Crenshaw v. JosephSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Williams v. SchwarzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Touart v. State ex rel. CallaghanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Lacoste v. DuffyTexas Supreme Court · 1878
- Nolen v. State ex rel. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Grant v. City of MobileCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Hyland v. BaumhauerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Springer v. State Ex Rel. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Coleman v. MangeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Bracken v. MullinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.