Blohme v. Schmancke
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Watts, J., Charleston, August, 1907. Summons to revive lien of judgment by J. C. Blohme, assignee of Cramer & Blohme in cause of Cramer & Blohme against C. T. Schmancke.
Read the full summary
Before Watts, J., Charleston, August, 1907. Summons to revive lien of judgment by J. C. Blohme, assignee of Cramer & Blohme in cause of Cramer & Blohme against C. T. Schmancke. From order refusing revival, Blohme appeals. cites: Until a judgment is entered there is no judgment: 43 S. C., 246; 40 S. C., 255; 27 S. C., 477; 14 S. C., 571; 21 S. C„ 259; 28 S. C., 78; 10 S. C., 278. Meaning of date of “original entry:” 78 S. C., 120. Revival has same force and effect as former recovery: 71 S. C., 250. cite: Mere indorsement of order does not make default judgment: 50 S. C., 498; 6 Ency. P. & P.,…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chibe Justice Pope.
The plaintiff represents that he and one A. F. C. Cramer were copartners as merchants in the city of Charleston, S. C., in the year 1890, that in September of that year they brought an action against C. L. Schmancke for the sum of $4,205.03, and no answer, demurrer or notice of appearance was served by said Schmancke, and that on the 13th day of December, 1892. the Hon. T. B. Fraser, as Circuit Judge, signed an order which is indorsed on the complaint of the plaintiff for a judgment thereon. That the order for judgment of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mason v. Killough Music Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Manning v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Harvey v. GibsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- First National Bank v. Carolina Midland Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
- Manning v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994