Legal Opinion

Chisholm v. Radford Brick Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 7, 1895No. 190PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Northern District of Illinois. Assumpsit by the Radford Brick Company against Samuel S. Chisholm, James A. Boyd, and Bruce C. White. Plaintiff obtained judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs in error, citizens of Illinois, composing the firm of Chisholm, Boyd & White, sold, by contract in writing, to the defendant in error, a corporation of Virginia, a brick press, which by the sixth clause of the contract they agreed to take hack, and to refund the price, in case it failed to make good merchantable pressed brick from the clay of the Radford Brick Company, provided the clay were furnished to the press in proper condition and quantity, and the bricks made were properly burned. The suit was brougb t upon this clause of the agreement and judgment…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Power v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. Cobb v. HoustonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API