Legal Opinion

Binns v. Dazey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1896No. 17,913PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

The appellant sued the appellees for the partition of certain real estate situate in Crawfordsville, Indiana, of which it is alleged the plaintiff and defendants were the owners in fee simple, as tenants in common.

A trial of the issues by the court without a jury resulted in a finding for the defendants upon the complaint and a finding for the defendants, and against the said plaintiff, on the cross-complaint of the said defendants that the said defendants, the appellees, were the owners, as tenants in common, of the real-estate described in the complaint and cross-complaint, and that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. CaressIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Brock v. State ex rel. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Board of Commissioners v. BaconIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Brown v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Tobin v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. A----. B v. C----. DIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Franklin v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Latshaw v. State ex rel. LatshawIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Green v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Morrow v. MorrowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API