Legal Opinion

O'Connell v. Dearborn Police & Fire Pension Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1952No. Calendar 45,362PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

The separate petitions of the 2 petition-

ers have been consolidated for the purpose of consideration on this appeal. Each petitioner petitioned the circuit court for a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring defendant board to meet and approve of Ms petition filed with the defendant board for the purpose of placing him on service retirement annuity or “pension roll” of the defendant city. ’

Each petitioner claims and .defendants admit that he had- served over 20 years .of creditable service as fireman in the employ of defendant city.

The only question in this case is whether the defendant board…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. Board of Trustees of Dearborn Retirement SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Nyman v. Detroit Police Pension CommitteeMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. McCarthy v. CouzensMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bannan v. City of SaginawMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Crider v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Law Department Employees Union v. City of FlintMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Bannan v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Barry v. Flint Fire DepartmentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API