Legal Opinion

People v. Faxlanger

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1956PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

Defendant was convicted of unlawfully operating a filling station in that he willfully failed to procure a license from the Department of Taxation and Finance as required by section 283-a of the Tax Law. The Attorney-General concedes that the issuance of a license may be compelled by mandamus, and once issued may not be taken away except by due process. We are agreed that section 283-a of the Tax Law is valid.

We do not now concern ourselves with the unreasonableness of any regulation, for such question is not an issue here; nor are the alleged serious future dire consequences which defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anniston Manufacturing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Salzman v. ImpellitteriNew York Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hunter v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Stubbart v. County of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Jeffers v. DuffyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Town of North Hempstead v. Exxon Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API