Legal Opinion

Schwabacker v. Riddle

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1877PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria county; the ITon. J". W. Cochran, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

Riddle sued Henry and Jacob Schwabacker, Newman, Hllman and Fosbender, in an action on the case, for fraud and deceit in the sale of a stock, consisting of wheat, corn, rye, oats, malt, cattle, hogs, highwines, hay and coal, pertaining to a distillery at Sparland, in Marshall county. Fosbender was not served with process. Riddle had a verdict, upon which the court gave judgment for $1814.62, and the defendants served with process, appeal.

The Schwabackers, Newman, Ullman and Fosbender had been in partnership in operating the distillery—Fosbender owning the realty and fixtures, and the others…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Page v. Citizens Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Hess v. LowreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Findlater v. DorlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Clemson v. TrammellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  5. Kraft v. GreenoughAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API