Gonzalez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLINTON, Judge.
Appellant was charged by indictment that in the county and on the date alleged he did “then and there knowingly and intentionally deliver to I. C. Galvan a controlled substance,” to-wit: heroin. The charge of the Court in applying the law to the facts instructed the jury to find appellant guilty if it found that he “did intentionally or knowingly deliver a controlled substance, to-wit: heroin, to I. C. Galvan, as alleged in the indictment . . .” The verdict of the jury found appellant “guilty of the offense of knowingly and intentionally delivering a controlled substance…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Coulter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Barbee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- The People v. MannIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Marable v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Conaway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Huizar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- Cruz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1982
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.