Legal Opinion

Smith v. Orange Swan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 30, 1893No. 121PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.

This was a suit by appellants, as devisees and heirs of devisees under the will of Obedience Smith, against a number of defendants, to recover a tract of land which had belonged to their testatrix and had passed to plaintiffs under her will, subject to the powers therein conferred upon her executor to sell it.

All of the defendants except appellee Orange Swan either defaulted or recovered judgment under the statute of limitations. Swan had no title by limitation, and judgment was rendered for him upon the strength of his title otherwise shown, and this is the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hawley & King v. JamesNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
  2. Harrison v. McMurrayTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. O'Donnell v. C. R. Johns & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. West v. Hapgood West v. EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. DuvalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. First Nat. Bank of Wichita Fades v. ZundelowitzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Republic Production Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Republic Production Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API