Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Giambattista v. National Bank of Commerce

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 6, 1978No. 5006-1Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDore, J.

(concurring in part and dissenting in part)—

1. I concur that the trial court's granting of defendant banks' motion for summary judgment against all plaintiffs be set aside.

2. I concur in reversing and remanding for trial the case of Vant Zelfde v. Security Savings and Loan Association. However, on retrial, I would limit inquiry to the sole issue of the validity of the Vant Zelfde "release."

3. I dissent in the majority's failure to grant plaintiffs' judgment on their motions for summary judgment in the consolidated cases of Giambattista and Titus v. Rainier National Bank.

Although the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nippert v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Sims v. . U.S. Trust Co. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Anglo-Chilean Nitrate Sales Corp. v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Wagner Trading Co. v. Battery Park National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API