Legal Opinion

Yates v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 23, 2006No. A06A0255PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MlKELL, Judge.

The Henry County Solicitor-General’s Office filed an accusation against Rhonda Denise Yates, alleging three offenses: (1) failure to maintain lane with accident; (2) failure to drive on right; and (3) driving under the influence. Yates moved to quash the accusation, alleging that it did not sufficiently apprise her of the offenses with which she was charged. At the hearing on the motion to quash, Yates also argued that the accusation was defective because it did not allege the county in which the offenses occurred. The trial court denied Yates’s motion to quash.

Yates pled guilty…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Dumas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. State v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Ramsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Werner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Gordy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Samantha Shea Leamon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API