Legal Opinion

People v. Hoffman Floor Covering Corp.

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided January 26, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ellen M. Coin, J.

By guilty plea entered upon its default, defendant corporation has been convicted of a violation of Administrative Code of the City of New York § 11-809 (a), and sentenced to pay a fine in the sum of $1,000. Defendant now moves for an order vacating the default judgment on the grounds of excusable default and meritorious defense (i.e., that the instant ordinance is *657inapplicable to its vehicle). In essence, defendant’s motion is a request pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) to vacate the judgment in the interests of justice based on a broad interpretation of due…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. New York Paving, Inc.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1992
  3. Metropolitan Convoy Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API