Legal Opinion

Van de Water v. Echols

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 9, 1980No. 78-2022PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERSEY, Judge.

Appellants, Van de Water, seek reversal of a summary final judgment in a negligence case involving personal injuries.

As a result of a vehicular collision, appellant Charles Van de Water suffered lacera*148tions in his ear, neck and face which required more than fifty stitches. Subsequently, he negotiated for and signed a release in favor of the parties defendant, which purported to include any and all claims “growing out of personal injuries known or unknown.” Van de Water later required an operation for removal of a sub-dural hematoma. Notwithstanding the release appellants filed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. De Witt v. Miami Transit CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Boole v. Florida Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1941
  3. Ormsby v. GinolfiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  4. Stiff v. NewmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  5. Sutton v. CapetanidisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sponga v. WarroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Cardinale v. ThompsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API