In re Rothenberg

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1985 and maintained an office for the practice of law in Connecticut.

By decision dated July 18, 2000, this Court imposed an interim suspension upon respondent because of his conviction of income tax evasion in Federal court and directed respondent to show cause why a final disciplinary order should not be made (274 AD2d 738). Respondent had been sentenced to probation for two years and fined $10,000.

In addition to his submission in mitigation, respondent advises that, on July 21, 2000, he was suspended from practice in…