Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Damron

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1868PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Marion County; the Hon. Silas L. Bryan, Judge, presiding. ' This was a proceeding by defendants in error to set aside conveyances of property to Mary A. Sweeney, wife of Thomas M. Sweeney. The facts set up in the bill, and the answer to the defendants below, the ruling of the court thereon, and the errors assigned on this record, are fully set out in the opinion, and need not be here repeated.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

The bill alleges, that defendants in error had previously, at the January and February terms, 1868, of the Marion Circuit Court, obtained judgments against Thomas M. Sweeney, for the sum of $3642.35; that executions had not issued, for the reason that they would have been unavailing, as defendant in the judgment had no property upon which to levy; that about the 8th day of June, 1859, Thomas M. Sweeney and his father, Isaac Sweeney, purchased from one Snelling a tract of land in Marion county, and being known as lot eleven in Snelling’s addition to the town of Kinmundy; that in the fall of…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bridgford v. RiddellIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. McLaurie v. PartlowIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Bowman v. AshIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Gridley v. WatsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Pike v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API