Saccente v. Toterhi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., Nunez and Tilzer, JJ.; Markewich and McNally, JJ., dissent in the following memorandum by McNally, J.: I would deny the discovery. The photographs of the plaintiff in question were taken by a representative of the defendants’ insurance carrier a short time after the accident. Plaintiffs in tort actions are not entitled to obtain the product of investigations on accidents by automobile liability insurers in preparation for the handling of 1 claims against their insureds. No special circumstances are alleged. There is no showing of prejudice. Plaintiff could have…
2Cited by14 opinions
- DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Kane v. Her-Pet Refrigeration, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Sands v. News America Publishing Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Marte v. W.O. Hickok Mfg. Co., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Careccia v. EnstromAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.