Hicklin Engineering, L.C. v. Bartell
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PRATT, District Judge.
The Court has before it Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss filed August 28, 2000. Defendant R.J. Bartell (“Bartell”) seeks dismissal of this diversity action for lack of personal jurisdiction or lack of venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1391. In the alternative, Bartell urges transfer of this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. In its resistance filed September 21, 2000, Plaintiff Hicklin Engineering, L.C. (“Hicklin”) asserts that personal jurisdiction exists and that venue requirements are met. The Defendant replied October 2, 2000. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Leonardo Martino and Trans One Ii, Inc., a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,718 Glen J. Travis v. Anthes Imperial LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Basic Chemicals, Inc. v. BensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lyngholm v. Fedex Ground Package Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2011