Legal Opinion
Baltimore & OR Co. v. Reaux
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 2, 1945No. 5081 CivilPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLOEB, District Judge.
This is an action of interpleader brought by the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company under the provisions of U.S.C.A. Title 28, Section 41, Subdivision 26.
The facts of the controversy, as alleged in the bill, are here set out in summary. The company is a citizen and resident of the State of Maryland and has its principal place of business at Baltimore, Maryland. It is a railroad corporation, but is authorized by the State of Maryland to issue insurance on the lives of its employees upon a mutual or assessment plan; and did issue a policy or certificate of insurance…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Griffin v. McCoachSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Mutual Life Insurnace v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Lámar v. MicouSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. WolfsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
- Simmons v. Continental Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1968
- Hershel Krasnow v. National Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Tarbert v. Ingraham CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1960
- Old Hickory Products Co., Ltd. v. Hickory Specialties, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.