Legal Opinion

Gueringer v. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1930No. 1285-5345PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, P. J.

cThis is a suit by the plaintiff in error, L. A. Gueringer, against the defendant in error, St. Douis, Brownsville, & Mexico Railway Company, to recover a certain debt for which the latter is alleged to be liable. The defendant company interposed a general exception to the plaintiff’s petition. This exception was sustained by the trial court, and, the plaintiff declining to amend, a judgment .of dismissal was entered. Various exceptions which are denominated “special exceptions,” but which are nothing more than general exceptions, were also sustained by the trial court. From the judgment of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Houston & T. C. R. R. Co. v. ShirleyTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Collins v. Chicago, St. Paul & Fond du Lac RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Jackson Consolidated Traction Co. v. Jackson Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, to Use v. Merchants Nat. BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Gueringer v. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Gueringer v. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API