Legal Opinion

Roswell Trading Co. v. Long

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1920No. 2438PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Chaves County, Brice, Judge. Action by the First State Bank & Trust Company of Roswell, N. M., against A. Long, in which the Roswell Trading Company intervened. From a judgment dismissing the intervention petition on demurrer, inter-vener appeals. Appellant, as dealer in grain, feed, etc., had lien on animals fed with grain sold by appellant.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Chaves County, Brice, Judge. Action by the First State Bank & Trust Company of Roswell, N. M., against A. Long, in which the Roswell Trading Company intervened. From a judgment dismissing the intervention petition on demurrer, inter-vener appeals. Appellant, as dealer in grain, feed, etc., had lien on animals fed with grain sold by appellant. Sec. 20, Art. 2, Chap. 65, Laws 1917; See. 3339, Code 1915. Possession is necessary to' establish the lien. Sec. 20, Art. 2, Chap. 65, Laws 1917; Cotton v. Arnold, 95 S. "W.; Note to 6 L. R. A. 82; Fishnell v. Morris, 6 L. R.…

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT.

RAYNOLDS, J.

The case arose out of the following facts: The First State Bank & Trust Company of Roswell, N. M., sought to foreclose a chattel mortgage on the property of the defendant, A. Long; said chattel mortgage being given to secure a promissory note. The Roswell Trading Company, appellant, herein, intervened in said suit, alleging as a cause of action against the defendant Long, money due for goods and merchandise sold to him. Appellant further claimed a lien against the livestock of the defendant, which livestock had consumed the feed sold to the defendant, and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. El Paso Cattle Loan Co. of El Paso v. HuntNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Ahlswede v. SchoneveldNevada Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API