Legal Opinion

Whitehead Bros. v. Mundy

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 3, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before Judge Janes. ■ Polk superior court. Feb-i’uary term, ] 892.

1Opinion of the Court

This cáse was submitted by agreement to the j udge "without a jury, on the following facts: The claimant had se't apart to himself as his estate, for use and benefit of his family, a homestead in certain lands to which he had no title, the title being outstanding in one ■Cochran, the claimant having possession when they were so set apart. Plaintiffs are judgment creditors of the claimant, and had ji. fa. against him levied, since the homestead was set apart, upon cotton raised on said lands since the homestead was set apart, to which levy ■& claim under the .homestead was interposed by the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boston Insurance Co. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Bashinski v. TalbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1902
  3. Mozley & Co. v. FontanaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Smith v. Georgia Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  5. Bashinski v. TalbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API