Legal Opinion

State v. Hartley

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Appeals reversing the trial court’s decree that defendant’s dog be destroyed. See T.C.A. § 44-17-120. The Court of Appeals held that there was no material evidence to support the trial judge’s order, and that the entry of judgment without evidence was a denial of due process. The court also held that the trial court erred in denying defendant a jury trial, as requested. The appellant questions only the holding that the defendant was entitled to a jury trial. We agree with appellant that the defendant was not entitled to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith County Education Ass'n v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Balsinger v. Town of MadisonvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hunt v. HuntTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Willard v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Darnell v. ShapardTennessee Supreme Court · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee ex rel. Robert L. Wolfenbarger, III. v. Scott MooreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
  2. Tennessee Department of Correction v. David PressleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
  3. Thomas W. Harrison, Terry Harrison, and Brenda Harrison Kennamore v. Earl LaursenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  4. Tom and Karen Moore v. Lloyd A. Walwyn, M.D. - DissentingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API