Legal Opinion

City of Bloomfield v. Blakely

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 18, 1921PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Davis District Coúrt. — D. M. ANDerson, Judge. DEFENDANT was convicted in mayor’s court of violation of an ordinance of the city of Bloomfield, regulating the speed of automobiles upon the public streets. He appealed to the district court, where the action of the mayor’s court was sustained, and he now prosecutes his appeal to this court.

1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.

I. Municipal corporations : ordinances: enactment without three readings. I. An information was filed in the mayor’s court of the appellee city, charging the appellant with violation-of Ordinance No. 226 of said city. The said ordinance fixes the speed limit of automobiles upon the streets of said city.. „ , , The question for our determination is -, ,, , ,, -,. . .. whether or not the ordinance m question was legally adopted by the city council. The record of the proceedings of the city council respecting the adoption of said ordinance has been certified to us. Said record is as follows:

“Coun…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farmers Telephone Co. v. Town of WashtaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Markham v. City of AnamosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Town of Olin v. MeyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  4. Cook v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Collins v. City of Iowa FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Central States Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API