Legal Opinion

McKain Law, PLLC v. Brutvan

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2014PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Phillip R. Rumsey, J.

Petitioner law firms — McKain Law, PLLC (McKain Law) and Coughlin and Gerhart, LLP (C & G) — represented respondent in a federal court action, commenced pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 USC § 1001 et seq.) (ERISA), to recover disability benefits allegedly due him (Brutvan v CIGNA Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.) (the underlying action), in which the court denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment, granted summary judgment to plaintiff (respondent herein) on the issue of liability, and noted that it would schedule a trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Linda B. Jones v. Unum Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. Williams v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  3. Donachie v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  4. Hi-Lex Controls, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  5. City of Buffalo v. George Irish Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mallett Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  2. McKain Law, PLLC v. BrutvanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. McKain Law, PLLC v. BrutvanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API