Legal Opinion

Gucker v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1899Published

Appeal by the defendants, The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 18th day of November, 1897, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term. This appeal was transferred from the first department to the second department.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

This is the usual abutter’s action for damages occasioned by the construction and operation of an elevated railroad. While we might have differed from the learned trial judge in his conclusion as to the amount of the damages inflicted on the plaintiff’s property, we cannot say that his findings were so clearly against the weight of the evir dence as to justify this court, under the well-settled rules, in interfering with the judgment. But there has been committed a plain error of law. The plaintiff’s title accrued by devise from his mother, who died on the 28th day of March, 1889.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Griswold v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API