Legal Opinion

Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 21, 1992PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEBELEIN, Judge.

Plaintiffs Hoechst Celanese Corporation and Celanese Engineering Resins, Inc. (hereinafter “HCC” or “plaintiffs”) filed a declaratory judgment action to determine the obligations of defendant insurers for liability and defense costs associated with judicial and administrative actions filed against HCC arising from the manufacture and sale of Celcon®, an acetyl polymer resin. Plaintiffs have filed this motion for a protective order to oppose the production of documents generated in the underlying plumbing cases litigated by HCC based upon attorney-client privilege and the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  3. In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. Waste Management, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Vicor Corp. v. Vigilant InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  2. Tackett v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  3. State v. Hydrite Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  4. Turner v. BernsteinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2000
  5. Princeton Insurance v. VerganoCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API