Legal Opinion

State v. Bridgeforth

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 31, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION1

JONES, Judge.

The appellant, Shelby Ross Bridgeforth, appeals of right from his conviction for theft over the value of $1,000. He contends that the trial court committed error of prejudicial dimensions when it permitted the bailee of the stolen property to establish its value.2 The State contends that the bailee from whom the property was stolen is qualified to establish the value of stolen property in a prosecution for theft. The trial court found that the value of the stolen property was $7,500.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed for the reasons set forth in this opinion; and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Norris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
  2. Reaves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HoltCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  2. State of Tennessee v. Corey GilliamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  3. State of Tennessee v. Russell E. MillsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  4. State of Tennessee v. Terry TrammellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017
  5. State of Tennessee v. Toscar C. Carpenter, Sr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API