Legal Opinion

Hemmerle v. Hobby

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 2, 1953No. Civ. 674-52PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, District Judge.

This matter was before the Court upon a motion for summary judgment on behalf of defendant against the plaintiff, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules, 28 U.S.C.A., upon the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the defendant is entitled as a matter of law to judgment in accordance with the Social Security Act 1 , affirming the decision of the Social Security Administration of the Federal Security Agency.

Upon the filing of briefs and argument before the Court the parties stipulated that “that the record submitted to the Court * * * is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Walker v. AltmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. United States v. LaLoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  4. Social Security Board v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  5. Ridge Country Club v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Caroline B. Ferenz v. Marion B. Folsom, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  2. Fuller v. FolsomDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1957
  3. Irvin v. HobbyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1955
  4. Ussi v. FolsomDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1957
  5. Bostick v. FolsomDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API