Haight v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Held that petitioner was not an employee of a political subdivision of the State of Illinois and his compensation was not exempt.
1Opinion of the Court
GEORGE I. HAIGHT, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
EDMUND D. ADCOCK, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
Haight v. Commissioner
Dockets Nos. 9475, 9476, 23739, 23740.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
14 B.T.A. 844; 1928 BTA LEXIS 2895;
December 20, 1928, Promulgated
Held that petitioner was not an employee of a political subdivision of the State of Illinois and his compensation was not exempt.
Irvin H. Fathchild, Esq., for the petitioners.
H. L. Jones, Esq., for the respondent.
TRAMMELL
These are proceedings for the redetermination of deficiencies…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Haight v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928