Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dennis v. Harding Glass Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 23, 1996No. 86932Published

1Concurrence

BUETTNER, Judge,

specially concurring:

I concur solely on the basis of Wise v. Wollery, 904 P.2d 151 (Okla.App.1995). However, the clear legislative intent of 85 O.S.1991 § 44 is thwarted by not applying § 44 when the employee seeks recovery of workers’ compensation benefits from the employer and also makes a claim under uninsured motorist insurance purchased by the employer. In this case, the employee elected to proceed against the employer’s insurance carrier standing in the shoes of the tortfea-sor. Section 44 clearly states that the employer is only required to contribute the deficiency…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wise v. WolleryCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API