Legal Opinion
Central National Bank v. White
The Superior Court of New York City
Decided July 5, 1892Published
Appeal from a judgment entered upon the report of a referee dismissing’ the complaint. The facts and points in the case appear fully from the opinion of the court and the following opinion of the referee before whom the case was tried.
1Opinion of the Court
Henry H. Anderson, Referee.
“ Theplaintiff, a bank organized in the city of New York, had a large number of customers who bought and sold gold, stocks, bonds and other securities, through the agency of the bank, the securities being kept by the bank to be used subject to the order of the customer. The entire charge of this business, the custody of the securities, purchase and sale of the stocks, and the correspondence with the customers in relation to the same, were entrusted to the cashier of the bank. Neither the directors nor any superior officer exercised any supervision over him ; he was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Morris v. . RexfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Conrow v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Moller v. . TuskaNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Shultz v. . HoaglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Eaton v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.