Legal Opinion

Laura A. Cramer (Billado) v. James E. Billado, III

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 26, 2017No. 2016-226PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

¶ 1. Defendant James Billado appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to set aside a default judgment of foreclosure on the grounds that the trial court erred in allowing service of the foreclosure complaint by tack order and in declining to set aside the default foreclosure judgment in light of his defenses. Plaintiff Laura Cramer argues that defendant's appeal was untimely and we thus need not consider the merits of his appeal. We conclude that the trial court's orders were within its discretion and accordingly affirm.

¶ 2. The events leading to this appeal are rooted in the parties'…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trepanier v. Getting Organized, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Courtyard Partners v. TannerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. LaFrance Architect v. Point Five Development South Burlington, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. Everlasting Memorial Works v. Huyck Monument WorksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
  5. Mongeon Bay Properties, LLC v. Mallets Bay Homeowner's Assn., Anthony J. Sineni and Merrimack Mortagage Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gondal Group v. BurkeVermont Superior Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API