Blanchard v. Department of Transportation
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Dissent
SAUFLEY, C.J.,
with whom ALEXANDER, J., joins, dissenting.
[¶ 40] It is the responsibility of the courts to assure that government does not abuse its extraordinary power to take the private property of its citizens against their wishes. Because the taking in this case is for the benefit of identifiable private individuals, the taking does not satisfy the public use requirement of the Maine Constitution. Therefore, I must respectfully dissent.
[¶ 41] It is well established that, without the consent of the property owner, the government may only exercise its power of eminent domain when the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Finks v. Maine State Highway CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Southwestern Illinois Development Authority v. National City Environmental, L.L.C.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Brown v. GeraldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
- Baycol, Inc. v. Downtown Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.