Cobbs Land Co. v. Colonial Hill Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
We do not think that the auditor properly construed the sixth paragraph of the contract; and the court did. not err in sustaining the plaintiff’s exception to his seventh finding of law. Allen and Davidson agreed that they would sell, before March 1, 1913, such an amount of the land as would net the owner, “in cash or notes,” the sum of $50,000, and that they would sell, between March 1, 1913, and March 1, 1914, such an additional amount of this land as would net the owner, “in cash and notes, the balance of the purchase-money it is entitled to receive…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Equitable Loan & Security Co. v. WaringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Miller v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Wynne v. FisherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- McGehee v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gilleland v. WelchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Roberts v. MayerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Norton v. HuttonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Gray v. Quality Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Gray v. Quality Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.