Legal Opinion

Irvin L. Young Foundation, Inc. v. Damrell

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 10, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOLNIK, Justice.

The United States District Court for the District of Maine (District Court) has certified to this court the following question of law pursuant to 4 M.R.S.A. § 57 (Supp. 1985-1986) and Rule 76B of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure:

Does plaintiffs ex parte attachment of Maine real estate, which real estate was held in joint tenancy by the intervenor and the original defendant Frank K. Damrell at the time of the issuance of the order of attachment, continue to encumber that property notwithstanding the fact that the debtor-tenant, Frank K. Damrell, died after the attachment but…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strout v. BurgessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  2. Frederick v. ShormanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. Knibb v. Security Insurance Company of New HavenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  4. Hughes v. Fairfield Lumber & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  5. Irvin L. Young Foundation, Inc. v. DamrellDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Szelenyi v. MillerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  2. Schaefer v. Peoples Heritage Savings BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API