Legal Opinion

Helmchen v. White Hen Pantry, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 1997No. 56A03-9609-CV-337PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STATON, Judge.

Robert and Judy Helmchen, individually and as representatives of the Estate of Christel Helmchen, deceased, bring this appeal contending that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant, White Hen Pantry, Inc (“WHP”). The Helmehens present two issues which we consolidate and restate as whether WHP owes a duty to its franchisees’ employees to provide a secure workplace.

We affirm.

WHP is a franchisor of convenience stores. WHP entered into a franchise agreement with Wayne Whitacre for a convenience store to be operated in Valparaiso, Indiana.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Webb v. JarvisIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Stephenson v. LedbetterIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Reed v. LuznyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Ramon v. Glenroy Const. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Little v. Howard Johnson Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kerl v. Dennis Rasmussen, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Wendy Hong Wu v. Dunkin' Donuts, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2000
  3. VanDeMark v. McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. National Gear & Piston, Inc. v. Cummins Power System, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  5. Ebbinghouse v. FirstFleet, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API